Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion to vacate the prior order entered on its default since the appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Matter of Fierro v Fierro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.