Appellant's suppression motion was properly denied. Reasonable suspicion to detain appellant existed based on an apparent eyewitness's detailed account of an assault that had been or was being committed, and his pointing out of the victim and his attackers as they approached, along with the officer's immediate observations of a staggering victim being followed by appellant who engaged in various furtive behavior upon seeing the police (see, People v Green, ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.