The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and reliability of identification testimony. There was ample evidence supporting the conviction for robbery in the first degree committed while armed with a deadly weapon (Penal Law § 160.15 [2]), including evidence that defendant shot the victim. The weight and sufficiency of the evidence supporting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.