BUSBY v. MOORE

No. 24779.

330 S.C. 201 (1998)

498 S.E.2d 883

Melvin BUSBY, Bobby Blake, Danny Green, Calvin Rankin, Anthony Simpson, Lee Evans, Ronnie Sullivan, David Capps, Jerry Latimer, Sherman Rider, Rodney T. Arnold, Charles Smith, Freddie Berry, Dale Wright, Eric Sullivan, Charles Lofton, and Timothy Passmore, Applicants, Of whom Melvin Busby, Calvin Rankin, Lee Evans, Sherman W. Rider, Rodney T. Arnold, Charles Lofton are Petitioners, v. Michael MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. and Timothy YOUNG, Norman Sherman, Ronald Jones, George Robinson, Phillip Clay, Brian Mack, Terry Collins, Claude Johnson, David F. King, Derrick Latimer, Mark Cunningham, David Case, Emmanuel Flemming, Clifton Scott, Danny Bailey, Irvin Wilson, Harold Blassingame, Andrew Lusk, George Phillips, James Allen Taylor, and Bobby Gresham, Applicants, Of whom Norman Sherman, Ronald Jones, Phillip Clay, Terry Collins, David F. King, Irvin Wilson, Andrew Lusk, James Allen Taylor, and Bobby Gresham are Petitioners, v. Michael MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. and Michael T. REIDEL, J.B. Hardee, Clary Dillard, Willie Workman, Vincent Brown, Dennis Sullivan, William Smith, Rene Hernandez, Dean B. Hawkins, Richard D. Kidd, John A. Hagood, and Michael Earl Wilson, Applicants, Of whom Dean B. Hawkins and Richard D. Kidd are Petitioners, v. Michael MOORE, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided April 13, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Assistant Appellate Defender M. Anne Pearce, South Carolina Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for petitioners.

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon, Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Teresa A. Knox, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Teresa N. Cosby, Columbia, for respondent.


PER CURIAM:

Applicants, all inmates in the custody of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, filed individual applications for post-conviction relief (PCR). Their cases were consolidated, and after a hearing, respondent's motion for summary judgment was granted. Petitioners now seek a writ of certiorari. We grant the writ, dispense with further briefing, and affirm.

Section 24-13-210(A) of the Code states:

A prisoner convicted of an offense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases