Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendant's answer since the defendant had disappeared or made himself unavailable for scheduled examinations before trial (see, Cavallino v Sonsky,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.