1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 246 Conn.
  5. 246 Conn. 281 (1998)
 

CONETTA v. STAMFORD

(SC 15807)

246 Conn. 281 (1998)

MICHAEL CONETTA v. CITY OF STAMFORD ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released August 11, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Booth M. Kelly, Jr., for the appellant (named defendant).

Michael Osborne and Kara K DeRosa, certified legal interns, with whom were Carolyn W. Kaas and Deborah R. Witkin, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Callahan, Borden, Norcott, Katz and McDonald, Js.

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether, at this particular stage of the proceedings, we have jurisdiction to consider the defendant's appeal. We conclude that we do not. Accordingly, we are constrained to dismiss the appeal.

The record discloses the following undisputed facts. The plaintiff, Michael Conetta, became a police officer for the named defendant, the city of Stamford (defendant),1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases