The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Conflicting expert testimony concerning the cause of death was properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its decision to accept the testimony of the People's experts, which was amply supported by the totality of the evidence (see, People v Hoch, 150 N.Y. 291, 299).
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in admitting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
