GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN


251 A.D.2d 272 (1998)

675 N.Y.S.2d 64

Al Goldstein, Appellant, v. Patricia F. Goldstein, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 30, 1998


Given the history of adjournments by plaintiff in this matrimonial action and the fact that the date of the hearing upon defendant's entitlement to counsel fees had been repeatedly marked "final", the court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for a ninth adjournment predicated on an unsworn letter and in subsequently denying plaintiff's motion to reopen the hearing (Treppeda v Treppeda, 212 A.D.2d 592

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases