Given the history of adjournments by plaintiff in this matrimonial action and the fact that the date of the hearing upon defendant's entitlement to counsel fees had been repeatedly marked "final", the court properly exercised its discretion in denying plaintiff's request for a ninth adjournment predicated on an unsworn letter and in subsequently denying plaintiff's motion to reopen the hearing (Treppeda v Treppeda,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOLDSTEIN v. GOLDSTEIN
251 A.D.2d 272 (1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 64
Al Goldstein, Appellant, v. Patricia F. Goldstein, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 30, 1998
June 30, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.