Defendants ceased to perform legal work for plaintiffs in mid-1991, other than minor collection matters not pertinent here, and plaintiffs have failed to show how the general corporate work defendants rendered is substantially related to the underlying derivative actions alleging acts of corporate waste and breach of fiduciary trust occurring subsequent to the cessation of that representation (see, Bank of Tokyo Trust Co. v Urban Food Malls,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GRAY v. RICHARDSON
251 A.D.2d 268 (1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 57
Richard E. Gray et al., Appellants, v. Ambrose M. Richardson, Iii, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 30, 1998
June 30, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
