REED v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BD.

No. 97-1610.

145 F.3d 373 (1998)

Stuart M. REED, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 9, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacqueline R. Scott argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Arthur A. Arfa, General Attorney, Railroad Retirement Board, argued the cause for respondent, with whom Catherine C. Cook, General Counsel, and Steven A. Bartholow, Deputy General Counsel, were on the brief.

Before: WALD, TATEL and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Former Conrail President Stuart M. Reed petitions for review of a decision by the Railroad Retirement Board declaring him ineligible for railroad retirement benefits. We deny the petition because substantial evidence supports the Board's determination that Reed terminated his employment with Conrail more than a year short of the ten years necessary to qualify for such benefits.

Under section 2(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act, an individual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases