WASHINGTON METRO. AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. BEYNUM

No. 97-1008.

145 F.3d 371 (1998)

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. Eugene L. BEYNUM and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Respondents.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. Dobbs, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Charles P. Monroe and Erik C.J. Anderson.

John G. Harnishfeger, argued the cause for respondent Beynum. Eric M. May was on the brief.

Samuel J. Oshinsky, filed the brief for respondent Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs. With him on the brief was Carol A. De Deo.

Before: WILLIAMS and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.


PER CURIAM:

This petition for review of an order of the Benefits Review Board, brought by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), raises a preliminary question relating to our jurisdiction. The question deals with the effect of the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321, on the adjudication of a claim arising under the District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act of 1928, D.C.CODE...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases