FINEBERG v. FINEBERG


309 N.J. Super. 205 (1998)

SHEILA R. FINEBERG, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. M. ALAN FINEBERG, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 6, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary E. Fox, attorney for appellant.

Jacobowitz, Grabelle, Defino, McGroughran & Latimer, attorneys for respondent (Timothy F. McGoughran, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CONLEY and CARCHMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This case again demonstrates the frustration encountered by the judges assigned to the Family Part, the matrimonial bar and the litigants themselves who are confronted with a litigant who manipulates the "system" in a manner designed to avoid bringing to an end a matrimonial dispute which has been pending for years and is finally ripe for disposition. Here, we have a defendant who ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases