1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 81 Ohio
  5. 81 Ohio St.3d 431 (1998)
 

STATE v. TUCKER

No. 96-1627.

81 Ohio St.3d 431 (1998)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. TUCKER, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 22, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Stevenson, Shelby County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael F. Boller, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Elsass, Wallace, Evans, Schnelle & Co., L.P.A., and Thomas A. Ballato, for appellee.

ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

This case requires us to resolve two issues. The first is whether Tucker was subjected to an "interrogation" by the corrections officers without being given the requisite Miranda warnings. The second issue is whether admission of Brock's taped statements was prejudicial error. For the reasons which follow, we determine that neither of the trial court's separate decisions to allow Tucker's statement and Brock's statements into evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases