1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 429 (1998)
 

LOKEIJAK v. CITY OF IRVINE

No. G018434.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 429 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 341

Atrick LOKEIJAK et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF IRVINE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

June 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McPhillips & Associates, William M. McPhillips and Nancy M. Critelli, Temecula, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, Daniel K. Spradlin and M. Lois Bobak, Orange, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

SILLS, Presiding Justice.

Department 17 of the Orange County Superior Court has a local court "policy" that discourages parties from filing motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication of issues.1 The written policy complains that (1) the procedure set up by Code of Civil Procedure section 437c is unduly time-consuming, cumbersome, and expensive, (2) the motions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases