The evidence was legally sufficient to support the possession charge. The totality of the evidence, including the undercover officer's conversations between herself and defendant, along with her testimony about the interplay between defendant and the codefendant, provided ample evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer defendant's possession of the drugs in question under the theory of accessorial liability and reject the claim that these drugs should be attributed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
