This appeal arises out of a dispute about developer fees between plaintiff and cross-defendant N.T. Hill (Hill) and defendant and cross-complainant City of Clovis (Clovis). In the trial court, Hill claimed that Clovis owed Hill money and had waived its right to fees related to certain road improvements. The trial court granted summary adjudication (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c) in favor of Clovis.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HILL v. CITY OF CLOVIS
Docket No. F025972.
63 Cal.App.4th 434 (1998)
N.T. HILL, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. CITY OF CLOVIS, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent; DEVELOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 21, 1998.
April 21, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Motschiedler, Michaelides & Wishon and Barbara A. McAuliffe for Plaintiff, Cross-defendants and Appellants.
Lozano, Smith, Smith, Wolliver & Behrens, Thomas J. Riggs and Christine A. Goodrich for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
