The court's findings were based on legally sufficient evidence and were not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of appellant's purposeful participation in the sale, including evidence that he directed several people to another individual who then exchanged drugs for money, that, upon the undercover officer's approach, appellant asked him "how many" he wanted, and that appellant then directed the officer to the other man, standing two feet away, who...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.