Respondent's findings that petitioner, engaging in horseplay with a fellow officer, placed his gun in the fellow officer's mouth, and thereafter, withdrawing the unholstered gun from his waistband, caused it to discharge, injuring the fellow officer, is supported by substantial evidence, in particular, the testimony of the fellow officer. Evidence that the fellow officer did not mention that the gun was placed in his mouth when first interviewed by respondent's investigators...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.