We agree with the motion court that defendants' obligation under the subject joint venture agreement terminated when, by reason of a pending foreclosure proceeding in which a receiver had been appointed, plaintiff lost control of the premises that had been its sole significant contribution to the venture and, as a consequence, became unable to perform further under the agreement. Plaintiff's argument that defendants acted in bad faith when, in an attempt to protect their...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
