Plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 (b) to collect a default judgment entered against defendants' insured. Defendants, however, properly disclaimed coverage under the policy with their insured, which plaintiff now seeks to reach to satisfy its judgment, and plaintiff has failed to plead or prove a recurring failure by defendants constituting a deceptive business practice under General Business Law § 349
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. v. ITT HARTFORD INS. CO.
249 A.D.2d 241 (1998)
672 N.Y.S.2d 310
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, Appellant, v. Itt Hartford Insurance Company et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 30, 1998
April 30, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
