THE STATE EX REL. KIRK ET AL., APPELLANTS,
BURCHAM, CLERK OF COURTS, APPELLEE.
Supreme Court of Ohio.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted May 26, 1998.
Decided July 29, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Southeastern Ohio Legal Services Program, Ruth Heintz and Mark J. Cardosi, for appellants.
Lambert & McWhorter and Randall L. Lambert, for appellee.
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Appellants assert in their propositions of law that the court of appeals erred by denying the writ of mandamus. They initially contend that the court of appeals erred in holding that the case was moot.
But insofar as appellants sought a writ of mandamus to compel Burcham to journalize the divorce decree, the case was rendered moot by Burcham's January 10, 1997 journalization of the decree. A writ of mandamus will not issue to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.