The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's credibility determinations.
The trial court properly declined to charge the jury on the defense of agency, since "[t]he jury could not reasonably conclude from the evidence that defendant was acting solely as an extension of the buyer [citations omitted]" (People v Herring,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.