Respondents' determination that petitioner is not disabled is supported by credible evidence, including the Medical Board's own comprehensive examinations of petitioner. The medical evidence submitted by petitioner, expressly reviewed by the Medical Board, was subject to conflicting interpretations that the Medical Board alone had authority to resolve (see, Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF MARTUCCI v. NEW YORK CITY EMPLOYEES' RET. SYS.
248 A.D.2d 240 (1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 213
In the Matter of Peter F. Martucci, Appellant, v. New York City Employees' Retirement System et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 17, 1998
March 17, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.