1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 47 F.Supp.2d
  5. 47 F.Supp.2d 436 (1998)
 

ISOGON CORP. v. AMDAHL CORP.

No. 97 Civ. 6219 SAS.

47 F.Supp.2d 436 (1998)

ISOGON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMDAHL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 28, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max Moskowitz, Lynne A. Borchers, Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Robert F. Perry, Robert T. Tobin, Paul H. Heller, Alexos D. Skucas, Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, David E. Lovejoy, Mark E. Miller, Fliesler, Dubb, Meyer & Lovejoy, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Isogon Corporation ("Isogon") filed an action against defendant Amdahl Corporation ("Amdahl") alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,499,340 ("'340") and 5,590,056 ("'056"). Determination of infringement in a patent case involves a two-step process. First, a court must construe the claims of the patent; and second, the allegedly infringing device...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases