SOC. NATL. BANK v. BD. OF REV.

No. 97-1058.

81 Ohio St.3d 401 (1998)

SOCIETY NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT, v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 22, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arter & Hadden and Karen H. Bauernschmidt, for appellant.

Teaford, Rich & Wheeler and James R. Gorry, for appellees Wood County Board of Revision and Wood County Auditor.


Per Curiam.

Society contends that it met all the requirements of R.C. 5715.13 and 5715.19, and therefore had standing to file a complaint for a decrease in the valuation of the real property. We disagree.

The two statutes of primary importance when considering the standing of a party to file a complaint for a decrease in valuation with a board of revision are R.C. 5715.19 and 5715.13.

R.C. 5715.19(A)(1) provides:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases