C.A. No. 96-1460-A.

4 F.Supp.2d 477 (1998)

SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

April 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory L. Murphy, F. Allen Phaup, II, Murphy Morris & Mitchell, Alexandria, VA, of counsel, Frederick Brown, Lawrence B. Goodwin, Robert A. Cote, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe L.L.P., New York City, for plaintiff.

Cecelia H. Gonzalez, Basil C. Culyba, Thomas E. Gilbertsen, William D. Belanger, Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC, David J. Healey, Arnold, White & Durkee, Houston, TX, David Berg, Berg & Androphy, Houston, TX, Alan H. MacPherson, Russell L. Johnson, T. Lester Wallace, Fabio E. Marino, Arthur J. Behiel, Skjerven, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel, L.L.P., San Jose, CA, for defendant.


ELLIS, District Judge.

In this patent infringement action, plaintiff Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. ("SEL") alleges that defendants Samsung Electronics, Samsung Electronics America, and Samsung Semiconductor, (collectively "Samsung") made or sold active matrix display units that infringe SEL's U.S. Patent No. 5,543,636 ("the '636 patent"). Among its defenses to SEL's charge of infringement, Samsung alleges that the '636 patent is...

Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases