The observing officer's testimony concerning defendant's actions immediately preceding the charged sale did not constitute evidence of uncharged crimes. Even assuming the testimony suggested the existence of contemporaneous uncharged sales, such evidence would have been admissible on the charge of possession with intent to sell, as well as the sale charge (People v Pressley,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.