BERKELEY v. LIDDLE


247 A.D.2d 231 (1998)

668 N.Y.S.2d 354

Barry S. Berkeley, Respondent, v. Jeffrey L. Liddle et al., Appellants Liddle, O'Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson, Appellant, v. Barry S. Berkeley, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 5, 1998


Issues of fact exist precluding summary judgment, including whether the demeanor of the attorney who represented the client in the arbitration was so belligerent as to be offensive to the panel and prejudice the client's case, and whether the attorney's decision not to call the therapist to whom he had referred the client in order to develop a claim of emotional distress was motivated by the attorney's lack of awareness, until the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases