1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 74 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 397 (1998)
 

CLF v. INDUSTRIAL WELFARE COM.

No. A079402.

74 Cal.Rptr.2d 397 (1998)

63 Cal.App.4th 982

CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, AFL-CIO et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. INDUSTRIAL WELFARE COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

Review Denied July 22, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Carroll & Scully, Charles P. Scully, II, Donald C. Carroll, San Francisco, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Randall P. Borcherding, Deputy Attorney General, Marguerite Stricklin, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Richard J. Simmons, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Los Angeles, for Amici Curiae for Respondent.

PETERSON, Presiding Justice.

Appellants the California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO, a union officer, and individual employees (collectively CLF) contend the trial court erred in concluding that the Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) acted properly when the IWC amended certain of California's overtime pay requirements, to make those overtime rules more closely comply with the provisions of federal law. Specifically, CLF contends the IWC erred in generally adopting the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases