The IAS Court improvidently exercised its discretion here in denying the motion to renew where plaintiffs provided additional evidence not previously before the court, offered a reasonable excuse for their failure to include the additional submissions in the original motion, and demonstrated the merit of their action, and there is no claim of prejudice by defendants (see, American Continental Props. v National Union Fire Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SCANNELL v. MT. SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
256 A.D.2d 214 (1998)
683 N.Y.S.2d 18
EDWARD SCANNELL et al., Appellants, v. MT. SINAI MEDICAL CENTER et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 22, 1998.
Decided December 22, 1998.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.