EEF v. QUACKENBUSH

No. A076894.

77 Cal.Rptr.2d 390 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 1397

ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT FOUNDATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Charles QUACKENBUSH, as Insurance Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent; State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

Review Denied November 18, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gil M. Coogler, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General; Paul Gifford, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Gerald A. Engler, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Paul Alexander, Vanessa Wells and Daniel T. Rockey, Palo Alto, for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.


PHELAN, Presiding Justice.

Economic Empowerment Foundation (EEF) seeks review of a judgment dismissing a petition for writ of mandate by which it sought to set aside an insurance rate increase requested by real parties in interest State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm General Insurance Company (collectively, State Farm), and approved by Charles Quackenbush, the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California (the Commissioner). The trial court sustained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases