Although plaintiffs in their letter of January 29, 1993 clearly and unequivocally offered to rescind the parties' renewal contract, it is plain that defendant did not accept the offer of rescission but instead attempted to renegotiate the terms of the renewal contract and in so doing prevented plaintiffs from pursuing other business opportunities. The renewal contract, never having been rescinded, remained binding upon the parties and, as is here relevant, requires the payment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
