Robert K. BELL, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
FORE SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 29, 1998.
June 29, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Steven G. Schulman, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, New York City, Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, Richard Schiffrin, Schiffrin, Craig & Barroway, Bala Cynwyd, PA, Thomas W. Brown, Carnegie, PA, Lawrence G. Soicher, New York City, for Robert K. Bell, Kenneth Jantz, Martin A. Rich, Stanley Kapron, Millionerrors Investment Club, Ed Saber and Neil Lazzaro.
Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, Daniel E. Bacine, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, Philadelphia, PA, for Alexander Haff.
Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, Sherrie R. Savett, Todd S. Collins, Genna D. Kidd, Berger & Montague, Philadelphia, PA, Mel E. Lifshitz, Bernstein, Liebhard & Lifshitz, New York City, Kurt Olsen, Berger & Moss, Corpus Christi, TX, for Meridian Capital Funding, Inc.
Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, Robert P. Frutkin, Savett, Frutkin, Podell & Ryan, Philadelphia, PA, Ira Richards, Trujillo, Rodriguez & Richards, Philadelphia, PA, for Ray Chiostri.
Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Gerald L. Rutledge, Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, for Rita M. Davidson.
David J. Manogue, Howard A. Specter, Joseph N. Kravec, Specter, Specter, Evans & Manogue, Pittsburgh, PA, Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Philadelphia, PA, for Oscar Federbusch.
David A. Brownlee, Thomas R. Johnson, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Pittsburgh, PA, for Fore Systems, Inc., Eric C. Cooper, Michael I. Green, Robert D. Sansom, Francois J. Bitz, Onat Menzilcioglu and Thomas J. Gill.
United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
ORDER
CINDRICH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29 day of June, 1998, after the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint in the above-captioned case, and after the defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6), and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted ten days after being served with a copy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
