1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1998)
 

ABBOTT v. TAZ EXP.

No. G018400.

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1998)

Madelyn ABBOTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TAZ EXPRESS et al, Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

November 9, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanton T. Mathews, Laguna Hills, and Paul Ralph, Brea, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gregory F. Stannard and Peter J. King, Culver City, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

CROSBY, J.

This appeal is brought by a personal injury plaintiff who contends a jury award for economic damages ($17,300) is inadequate as a matter of law because her vocational rehabilitation expert testified it would cost more than $115,000 to retrain her for less strenuous employment. In a takeoff on "baseball arbitration," plaintiff claims the jury was obliged to either accept or reject this expert testimony on a take-it-or-leave-it basis because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases