1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 77 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1998)
 

F & L FARM CO. v. CITY COUNCIL

No. F029033.

77 Cal.Rptr.2d 360 (1998)

65 Cal.App.4th 1345

F & L FARM COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY COUNCIL of the City of Lindsay, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

Review Denied October 21, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCormick Kabot Foley Jenner & Watson and S.L. Kabot, Visalia, for Defendant and Appellant.

Williams, Jordan & Brodersen and Steven R. Williams, Visalia, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

VARTABEDIAN, Acting Presiding Justice.

When a city in California has deprived California residents of constitutionally protected property interests and a judgment has been entered against it to compensate the residents for the wrongs committed, may the city simply refuse to pay the judgment on the basis that it has no spare money? We think not. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment entered below, which ordered issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases