WEINSTOCK v. HANDLER


251 A.D.2d 184 (1998)

674 N.Y.S.2d 368

Israel Weinstock et al., Appellants, v. Emmerich Handler et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 23, 1998


We agree with the trial court that the promissory note and other documentary evidence upon which plaintiffs now rely could have, with due diligence, been located or obtained prior to trial (CPLR 5015 [a] [2]; Prote Contr. Co. v Board of Educ., 230 A.D.2d 32). Moreover, the documents offered in support of the motion, to a great degree, do no more than raise issues as to the credibility of adverse witnesses and such issues in the present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases