ROSENTHAL v. CHADBOURNE & PARKE


249 A.D.2d 178 (1998)

672 N.Y.S.2d 599

Stuart A. Rosenthal, Appellant, v. Chadbourne & Parke, L. L. P., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 23, 1998


In view of the fact that the motion court has, in a scheduling order post-dating the order on appeal, directed that the documents requested by plaintiff be produced prior to the completion of plaintiff's deposition, the instant appeal is rendered moot. In any event, it was not an improvident exercise of the motion court's broad discretion in the supervision of disclosure (see, Matter of Love Canal Actions, 161 A.D.2d 1169...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases