1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 153 F.3d
  5. 153 F.3d 272 (1998)
 

U.S. v. WEINSTOCK

Nos. 96-2474, 96-2521.

153 F.3d 272 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Sanford WEINSTOCK, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided May 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Lustig (argued and briefed), Richard M. Lustig Law Office, Birmingham, MI, for Appellant.

Stephen J. Murphy, III (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Appellee.

Before: RYAN, COLE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Podiatrist Sanford Weinstock appeals from his jury conviction on twenty-six counts of mail fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan ("Blue Cross") by filing claims for medical procedures that he did not perform. The government cross-appeals, claiming that the district court erred in declining to enhance Weinstock's sentence.

For the following reasons, the judgment of the district court is in all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases