Upon review of the record in this medical malpractice action, we conclude that the jury's resolution of credibility issues, particularly with respect to the sharply conflicting testimony of the medical experts, was not against the weight of the evidence. As a result of the malpractice, plaintiff had already undergone two hip replacement operations at the age of 21, and it was estimated that she would require replacement surgery periodically, at least five or six more times...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
