1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 21 F.Supp.2d
  5. 21 F.Supp.2d 394 (1998)
 

MADLIN v. ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES CORP.

No. 98 Civ. 0894 (BDP).

21 F.Supp.2d 394 (1998)

Howard MADLIN and Marion Madlin, and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 14, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Goldman, Segel Goldman & Mazzotta, Albany, NY, for Plaintiff.

Mark Lansing, Helm, Shapiro, Anito & McCale, Albany, NY, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

PARKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Howard and Marion Madlin and those purportedly similarly situated claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that defendant Orange and Rockland Utilities Corporation ("O & R") failed properly to report to state taxing authorities its special franchise property and that this failure resulted in higher local taxes for them. As relief, they seek an order from this Court directing O & R to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases