The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Questions of credibility were properly presented to the jury and we see no reason to disturb its findings.
Viewed in the context of the trial as a whole, the remarks that the prosecutor elicited from one of the expert psychiatric witnesses called by defendant on the issue of intent concerning defendant's danger to himself and society were relevant to the jury's assessment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
