MARGOLIN v. GROSSMAN


254 A.D.2d 158 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 20

Laurence S. Margolin, Respondent, v. Morton Grossman et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 20, 1998


Since plaintiff contests defendants' position that, as per their agreement, plaintiff in fact received 50% of the amounts received by defendants from their clients for the five matters in question, the fee arrangements between defendants and these five clients are material and necessary. Attorneys' fee arrangements and bills are not within the scope of the attorney-client privilege (see, Matter of Priest v Hennessy, 51 N.Y.2d 62<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases