The jury's verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of defendant's intentional participation in the sale, including evidence that defendant directed the seller to provide the undercover officer with drugs, and waited and watched as the exchange took place.
Background testimony regarding the mechanics of street
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.