KALMBACH WAGNER SWINE RESEARCH FARM v. BD. OF REV.

No. 97-1196.

81 Ohio St.3d 319 (1998)

KALMBACH WAGNER SWINE RESEARCH FARM, APPELLEE, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF WYANDOT COUNTY ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 1, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Farthing & Harsha, John H. Farthing and Shelly R. Harsha, for appellee.

Teaford, Rich & Wheeler and James R. Gorry, for appellants.


LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

Appellants argue that, under Stanjim Co. v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Revision (1974), 38 Ohio St.2d 233, 67 O.O.2d 296, 313 N.E.2d 14, the BOR can require a complainant to submit an income and expense statement if the complainant is an owner of income-producing property seeking a reduction in property value. Appellants further maintain that the BOR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases