JOVINE v. FHP, INC.

No. B105314.

76 Cal.Rptr.2d 322 (1998)

64 Cal.App.4th 1506

Kathy V. JOVINE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FHP, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 24, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Romano, Los Angeles, and Kenneth H. Moss, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, Deborah C. Saxe and John P. LeCrone, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.


CROSKEY, Associate Justice.

This is a case about due process of law. Plaintiff Leo Baumohl1 appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of his employer, FHP, Inc. (FHP), and his supervisor, Charles Kiskaden (Kiskaden; collectively, defendants) after the trial court confirmed and adopted the decisions of a court-appointed referee on three motions for summary adjudication filed by the defendants.

Our review of the appellate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases