This Court has previously held that defendants were required to certify their income for the purpose of determining whether they were responsible for payment of a surcharge imposed pursuant to section 3-03 (a) of HPD's Rules and Regulations (28 RCNY 3-03 [a]), and that said HPD surcharge was not "rent" and therefore not preempted by section 236 of the National Housing Act (82 US Stat 498, as amended; 12 USC § 1715z-l) (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LINCOLN AMSTERDAM HOUSE, INC. v. BAXTER
249 A.D.2d 146 (1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 244
Lincoln Amsterdam House, Inc., Respondent, v. Charles Baxter et al., Appellants. (And Another Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 21, 1998
April 21, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.