1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 310 N.J.
  5. 310 N.J. Super. 82 (1998)
 

VICTORY PEACH GR., INC. v. GREATER NY MUT. INS. CO.

310 N.J. Super. 82 (1998)

VICTORY PEACH GROUP, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 6, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce E. Barrett, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Margolis Edelstein, attorneys; Mr. Barrett, on the brief).

Michael F. Chazkel, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Chazkel & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Chazkel and Thomas A. Chaseman, on the brief).

Before Judges CONLEY, WALLACE and CARCHMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONLEY, J.A.D.

In 1991, plaintiff insured, Victory Peach Group, Inc. (Victory Peach), owned and operated a motor inn in Springfield. On November 10, 1991, the property was insured by defendant Greater New York Mutual Insurance Company (Greater New York) under a commercial property insurance policy entitled "Protecto-Guard Policy." On that day, the property sustained damage as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases