The trial court properly exercised its discretion in finding that a pediatrician with 16 years experience, who had treated children with burns of the same nature as those received by the complainant, and whose professional instruction to medical students included how to determine the cause of burns, possessed the requisite skill and experience to be considered a medical expert on the subject of the causation of the burns (see, Fuller v Preis,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
