1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 21 F.Supp.2d
  5. 21 F.Supp.2d 366 (1998)
 

YAMANOUCHI PHARMACEUTICAL v. DANBURY PHARMACAL

Nos. 97 Civ. 3403(RO), 97 Civ. 8357(RO).

21 F.Supp.2d 366 (1998)

YAMANOUCHI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and Merck & Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. DANBURY PHARMACAL, INC., and Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants. YAMANOUCHI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., and Merck & Co., Inc., Plaintiffs, v. MARSAM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 1, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, Robert L. Baechtold, Hugh C. Barrett, Brian V. Slater, New York, NY, for Plaintiff Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co.

William Krovatin, Rahway, NJ, Arnold White & Durkee, John F. Lynch, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff Merck & Co., Inc.

Cummings & Lockwood, Barry Kramer, Steven J. Moore, James Jakobsen, Stamford, CT, for Defendants.

OPINION

OWEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Merck & Co., Inc. have brought suit against defendant Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc. and its subsidiaries Danbury Pharmacal, Inc. and Marsam Pharmaceutical, Inc.,1 for patent infringement under certain provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act (the Act).2

Under the Act, generic drug producers can target a patented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases