1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 83 Ohio
  5. 83 Ohio St.3d 302 (1998)
 

CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. HAAS

No. 97-2640.

83 Ohio St.3d 302 (1998)

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Gehring and Maria C. Palermo, for relator.

Mark A. Vander Laan, for respondent.

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. In Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bunce (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 112, 689 N.E.2d 566, we said that in imposing a sanction, we will take into account the duty violated, the mental state of the lawyer, the actual or potential injury caused by the misconduct, and the existence of mitigating factors. The duty violated here is to refrain from compensating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases